Year after year, Iowa lawmakers have failed to adequately fund recreation and conservation. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources is left crossing its fingers, wondering whether dollars will be there to manage parks, lodges, beaches, trails and camp sites. Communities hope there will be money for green spaces and trails.
Iowans travel to Missouri or Minnesota for better outdoor vacations. And this state ends up ranking an embarrassing 48th in the country for funding recreation.
But things are looking up.
The Iowa Senate overwhelmingly passed Senate Joint Resolution 2002 to amend the state constitution to dedicate a portion of state sales and service tax revenue to the outdoors. The resolution establishes a natural resources and outdoor recreation trust fund, to be financed with money generated by a sales-tax rate of three-eighths of 1 percent.
The House should follow suit. Passing this resolution is only the first step, though. To amend the state constitution, the resolution must be adopted by two consecutive Legislatures. Then the amendment needs approval from a majority of Iowa voters. After that, separate legislative action would be needed to increase the tax.
Let’s be up front about it: This would be a tax increase. The state now collects 5 cents in sales tax, and the tax would go to 5.375 cents.
But this relatively small tax increase for an individual or family would reap great rewards for the state. It would raise $150 million annually, the amount necessary to meet Iowa’s outdoors needs, according to the Legislature’s Interim Committee on Sustainable Funding for Natural Resources, which endorsed the sales tax.
“The committee looked at more than 40 alternative strategies,” said Mark Ackelson, president of the Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation. “This was the one that was the most secure and gave the public the most opportunity to weigh in. ”
An investment in recreation is an investment in all of Iowa. Great parks, trails and public lands attract people, who in turn attract businesses. Caring about the preservation of Mother Nature can boost property values and tourism. Studies show Iowans use the outdoors for biking, hunting, fishing and walking. But it takes money to conserve land and water and to build and maintain recreational amenities.
It’s rare in Iowa to use the state constitution to specify how funds will be used. Other examples: Motor-vehicle fees and fuel taxes can be used only for public highways. State license fees for hunting, fishing and trapping can be used only for fish and wildlife protection. Constitutionally targeted funds should remain rare, to leave lawmakers budget flexibility in changing economic times.
Establishing dedicated funding for the outdoors is hardly a radical idea, though. Several neighboring states have done so, through their constitutions or state law.
Missouri passed and constitutionally protected a portion of sales tax for the Department of Conservation in 1976. Then in 1984, voters approved a constitutional amendment for soil and water conservation and state parks and have reauthorized it twice since then. In 2006, the measure won approval from 70 percent of voters. Arkansas passed a constitutional amendment in 1996 to secure dollars for conservation, parks, tourism, heritage and beautification.
And now it’s Iowa’s turn. The Senate took the first step toward creating a reliable funding stream dedicated to the outdoors. There will be a lot more steps and plenty of time for public discussion. It’s time, though, to see this job through.
