N.D. Regulators to Quiz Pipeline Developer on Negotiation Tactics (complete article from source)
Source: Money.com
October 04, 2007
NEW YORK (Associated Press) - State regulators will ask TransCanada Corp. to explain its negotiating tactics after complaints from landowners along the route of a proposed crude oil pipeline in eastern North Dakota.
One landowner said negotiators who are acquiring the rights to use private land along the pipeline's suggested North Dakota route refused to negotiate terms, according to the state Public Service Commission. Another said he was told the project had all of its needed regulatory approvals, when it does not.
During a meeting Monday, commissioners Susan Wefald, Tony Clark and Kevin Cramer said they would demand an explanation from TransCanada, and may seek a meeting with company officials.
A TransCanada spokesman, Jeff Rauh, said the company is investigating two incidents about which the PSC recently provided information.
"Our policy and our commitment is to treat landowners with fairness, with respect, and to respond to questions accurately and truthfully, and to provide information that they need about the project," Rauh said. "Our intention is to have every landowner come away feeling as though they've been dealt with fairly."
Curtis Novak, of Dahlen, who opposes the pipeline, said a property negotiator told his in-laws that the pipeline was "a done deal," and that all of its permits were issued, to pressure them to sign a compensation agreement quickly. Novak farms the affected land.
"When they pull stuff like this, it makes me think that maybe they are not as pure as they say they are," Novak said in an e-mail message to the commission.
Wefald, who is the commission's president, said Wednesday that North Dakota law gives any group of at least five dissatisfied property owners the right to sue a utility to invalidate property easements if the utility used "deception, fraud or other unfair tactics" in acquiring the right to use the property.
"In some of the letters we're receiving, it just sounds like (TransCanada) is giving (landowners) the easement papers, and they make an offer. We're hearing, they won't negotiate," Wefald said. "Negotiation is part of the easement process."
TransCanada's Keystone pipeline project would bring crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta, to Patoka, Ill., and Cushing, Okla. The pipeline would stretch for 2,148 miles and transport as much as 590,000 barrels of oil daily.
Jim Belanus, of Walhalla, said in an e-mail message that TransCanada representatives "talk about good faith negotiations, but all I've seen from them is, 'This is the offer. If you don't like it, then that is too bad.'"
Belanus said one representative implied that if he did not agree to the company's offer, it would start the process of taking the property through eminent domain. Rauh said negotiators are told not to discuss condemnation, except in response to questions.
"I don't doubt the need for the line," Belanus wrote, "but I don't like their one-sided negotiations."
Wefald said the Public Service Commission is limited in what it may do for dissatisfied landowners, because the panel is in charge of approving a site plan for the pipeline. The agency cannot take an advocacy role against the company, Wefald said.
Click here for complete article from Money.com
|
