LandsofAmerica.com - Land Resources / News / County considers overruling landowner
#1 in Land for Sale Online
Land ID Search
International Paper Timberland for Sale
Click Below to Find a Farm or Ranch for Sale
America
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

Land for Sale
sort by
Most Popular
Most Expensive
Most Acreage

Land Resources / News / County considers overruling landowner
County considers overruling landowner (complete article from source)
Source: C-Ville.com, by Jayson Whitehead
October 04, 2007
Clara Belle Wheeler wants to keep her 77 acres in growth area



Bordered by Route 20 to its east and Darden Towe Park to its south, a 77-acre parcel owned by Clara Belle Wheeler is largely wooded except for the grandiose 1862 house she lives in and a few adjoining buildings. Down a rise and located in a small cow pasture is a log house—the reconstructed site of the birthplace of Revolutionary War hero George Rogers Clark.

Her parcel is also located in the northernmost corner of the Pantops growth area and that, combined with the incredible scenic and historic value, led Wheeler to first consider requesting a change to rural area classification when she inherited the land in 2000.

Wheeler reached out to her Albemarle Board of Supervisors representative, Ken Boyd, and attended various meetings. In time, her desire became common knowledge among some county officials. Consequently, when the Board pledged in a May 2006 Resolution of Intent to move another landowner’s parcel from Rural to Development, it seemed only natural to take out Wheeler’s 77 acres to lessen the impact of the former move.

Shortly thereafter, county staff recommended to reclassify Wheeler’s land as rural, and the change seemed inevitable until earlier this year when Wheeler for the first time discovered, in a C-VILLE article on the other property’s reclassification, that her land was under review. Upset, Wheeler raised such hackles that Boyd arranged for and accompanied her to a meeting with county staff late this spring.

“When we left [the meeting], I thought at that point she was still thinking about what she wanted to do,” Boyd says. Wheeler quickly made up her mind, appearing at a June 5 Planning Commission meeting to request her parcel remain in the Development Area.

Without a compelling reason to defy the landowner’s wishes, the Commission granted Wheeler’s request. After months of consternation, “I thought it was completely over,” Wheeler says.

But Wheeler found that wasn’t the case when she attended a September 12 Supervisors’ meeting. David Slutzky questioned whether it would make sense to reclassify her land anyway, based upon staff’s earlier recommendation.

“I was flabbergasted that they were bringing up my property,” Wheeler says. Nevertheless, staff was asked to return with a new proposal concerning her property.

The request creates a conundrum for the Board, a conundrum most succinctly spelled out by Slutzky at that September meeting: “We’re weighing the individual property owner’s wishes appropriately, but we should be weighing them against ultimately what’s the objective of this master planning process.”

At that same meeting, Wheeler offered her own view: “To propose a change in property rights or the land use for my property without contacting me is unconscionable,” she said during the public comment. “The property rights for the people who live in that area should be the concern of the people who live on that land.”

Following her plea, Supervisor Dennis Rooker observed, “There is no property right in a comprehensive plan designation,” he says. “If a designation changes for a property it does not change its zoning. It’s a change in how the property fits into the community’s long-term plan.”

Other county officials, however, take issue with this argument. “I think that it changes the value of the land,” says Marcia Joseph, Planning Commission chair. “Putting it in the growth area gives it more value because there’s more potential.”

“It doesn’t change the zoning, [Rooker]’s right,” Boyd says. “You still have to request a change in zoning, but where property ends up in the comprehensive plan is still very important.”

Boyd’s comments reveal a potential divide when the Supervisors reconvene on this issue, likely in November. “I’m inclined to lean on the side of the property owner unless there’s a compelling reason,” says Boyd. “All along I’ve wanted to do what Clara Belle wants.”

C-VILLE welcomes news tips from readers. Send them to news@c-ville.com.



Click here for complete article from C-Ville.com
Signup | Contact Us

View All Land, Farm, Ranch, and Waterfront Properties for Sale

Land for Sale | Alabama Land | Alaska Land | Arizona Land | Arkansas Land | California Land | Colorado Land | Connecticut Land | Delaware Land | Florida Land | Georgia Land | Hawaii Land | Idaho Land | Illinois Land | Indiana Land | Iowa Land | Kansas Land | Kentucky Land | Louisiana Land | Maine Land | Maryland Land | Massachusetts Land | Michigan Land | Minnesota Land | Mississippi Land | Missouri Land | Montana Land | Nebraska Land | Nevada Land | New Hampshire Land | New Jersey Land | New Mexico Land | New York Land | North Carolina Land | North Dakota Land | Ohio Land | Oklahoma Land | Oregon Land | Pennsylvania Land | Rhode Island Land | South Carolina Land | South Dakota Land | Tennessee Land | Texas Land | Utah Land | Vermont Land | Virginia Land | Washington Land | West Virginia Land | Wisconsin Land | Wyoming Land

Rural Homes for Sale | Alabama Homes | Alaska Homes | Arizona Homes | Arkansas Homes | California Homes | Colorado Homes | Connecticut Homes | Delaware Homes | Florida Homes | Georgia Homes | Hawaii Homes | Idaho Homes | Illinois Homes | Indiana Homes | Iowa Homes | Kansas Homes | Kentucky Homes | Louisiana Homes | Maine Homes | Maryland Homes | Massachusetts Homes | Michigan Homes | Minnesota Homes | Mississippi Homes | Missouri Homes | Montana Homes | Nebraska Homes | Nevada Homes | New Hampshire Homes | New Jersey Homes | New Mexico Homes | New York Homes | North Carolina Homes | North Dakota Homes | Ohio Homes | Oklahoma Homes | Oregon Homes | Pennsylvania Homes | Rhode Island Homes | South Carolina Homes | South Dakota Homes | Tennessee Homes | Texas Homes | Utah Homes | Vermont Homes | Virginia Homes | Washington Homes | West Virginia Homes | Wisconsin Homes | Wyoming Homes

Lake Houses for Sale | Alabama Lake Houses | Alaska Lake Houses | Arizona Lake Houses | Arkansas Lake Houses | California Lake Houses | Colorado Lake Houses | Connecticut Lake Houses | Delaware Lake Houses | Florida Lake Houses | Georgia Lake Houses | Hawaii Lake Houses | Idaho Lake Houses | Illinois Lake Houses | Indiana Lake Houses | Iowa Lake Houses | Kansas Lake Houses | Kentucky Lake Houses | Louisiana Lake Houses | Maine Lake Houses | Maryland Lake Houses | Massachusetts Lake Houses | Michigan Lake Houses | Minnesota Lake Houses | Mississippi Lake Houses | Missouri Lake Houses | Montana Lake Houses | Nebraska Lake Houses | Nevada Lake Houses | New Hampshire Lake Houses | New Jersey Lake Houses | New Mexico Lake Houses | New York Lake Houses | North Carolina Lake Houses | North Dakota Lake Houses | Ohio Lake Houses | Oklahoma Lake Houses | Oregon Lake Houses | Pennsylvania Lake Houses | Rhode Island Lake Houses | South Carolina Lake Houses | South Dakota Lake Houses | Tennessee Lake Houses | Texas Lake Houses | Utah Lake Houses | Vermont Lake Houses | Virginia Lake Houses | Washington Lake Houses | West Virginia Lake Houses | Wisconsin Lake Houses | Wyoming Lake Houses

Powered by LandsofAmerica.com
COPYRIGHT © 2003-Current, All Rights Reserved
Terms of Use